MAKIL U.
PUNDAODAYA, G.R.
No. 179313
Petitioner,
Present:
Puno, C.J.,
Quisumbing,
Ynares-Santiago,
Carpio,
Carpio Morales,
- versus - Chico-Nazario,
Velasco, Jr.,
Nachura,
Leonardo-De
Castro,
Brion,
Peralta,
Bersamin,
Del Castillo, and
Abad, JJ.
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS
and ARSENIO DENSING NOBLE, Promulgated:
Respondents.
September 17, 2009
x
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.:
This
petition[1] for certiorari under
Rule 65 assails the August 3, 2007 Resolution[2] of the Commission on
Elections (COMELEC) En Banc in SPA No. 07-202, which declared private respondent Arsenio Densing
Noble (Noble) qualified to run for municipal mayor of Kinoguitan, Misamis
Oriental, in the May 14, 2007 Synchronized National and Local Elections.
The
facts are as follows:
Petitioner
Makil U. Pundaodaya (Pundaodaya) is married to Judith Pundaodaya, who ran
against Noble for the position of municipal mayor of Kinoguitan, Misamis
Oriental in the 2007 elections.
On
March 27, 2007, Noble filed his Certificate of Candidacy, indicating therein that
he has been a resident of Purok 3, Barangay Esperanza, Kinoguitan, Misamis
Oriental for 15 years.
On April 3, 2007, Pundaodaya
filed a petition for disqualification[3] against Noble docketed as
SPA No. 07-202, alleging that the latter lacks the residency qualification
prescribed by existing laws for elective local officials; that he never resided
nor had any physical presence at a fixed place in Purok 3, Barangay Esperanza,
Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental; and that he does not appear to have the intention
of residing therein permanently. Pundaodaya claimed that Noble is in fact a
resident of Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City, where he also maintains a business
called OBERT Construction Supply.
In his Answer,[4] Noble averred that he is a
registered voter and resident of Barangay Esperanza, Kinoguitan, Misamis
Oriental; that on January 18, 1992, he married Bernadith Go, the daughter of
then Mayor Narciso Go of Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental; that he has been engaged
in electoral activities since his marriage; and that he voted in the said municipality
in the 1998, 2001 and 2004 elections.
In a resolution
dated May 13, 2007,[5]
the Second Division of the COMELEC ruled in favor of Pundaodaya and
disqualified Noble from running as mayor, thus:
Respondent Noble’s claim that he is a registered voter and has actually
voted in the past three (3) elections in the said municipality does not
sufficiently establish that he has actually elected residency at Kinoguitan,
Misamis Oriental. Neither does
campaigning in previous elections sufficiently establish residence.
Respondent Noble failed to show that he has indeed acquired domicile at
Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental. He failed
to prove not only his bodily presence in the new locality but has likewise
failed to show that he intends to remain at Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental and
abandon his residency at Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant Petition to Disqualify
Aresnio Densing Noble is hereby GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.[6]
Noble
filed a motion for reconsideration of the above resolution. In the meantime, he garnered the highest
number of votes and was proclaimed the winning candidate on May 15, 2007. Pundaodaya then filed an Urgent Motion to
Annul Proclamation.[7]
On August 3, 2007,
the COMELEC En Banc reversed the decision of the Second Division and declared Noble qualified
to run for the mayoralty position.
The
COMELEC En Banc held that when Noble married Bernadith Go on January 18, 1992, the
couple has since resided in Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental; that he was a registered
voter and that he participated in the last three elections; and although he is
engaged in business in Cagayan de Oro City, the fact that he resides in Kinoguitan and is a registered voter
and owns property thereat, sufficiently meet the residency requirement.[8]
Thus:
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Commission (en banc) RESOLVED, as
it hereby RESOLVES, to GRANT the instant Motion for Reconsideration and to
REVERSE AND SET ASIDE the Resolution promulgated on May 13, 2007 issued by the
Commission (Second Division).
ACCORDINGLY, respondent ARSENIO DENSING NOBLE is QUALIFIED to run for
the local elective position of Municipal Mayor of the Municipality of
Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental in the May 14, 2007 Synchronized National and
Local Elections.
SO ORDERED.[9]
Pundaodaya
filed the instant petition for certiorari, alleging that the COMELEC En Banc acted with grave abuse of discretion when it declared Noble qualified
to run; when it did not annul Noble’s proclamation; and when it failed to
proclaim the true winning candidate, Judith Pundaodaya.
In
a resolution dated November 13, 2007,[10] the Court required the
respondents to comment on the petition.
Public
respondent, through the Office of the Solicitor General, filed a Manifestation
and Motion[11]
praying that it be excused from filing a separate comment and that the said
pleading be considered sufficient compliance with the November 13, 2007
Resolution.
Meanwhile,
for Noble’s failure to comply, the Court issued Resolutions[12] dated July 15, 2008 and
December 9, 2008 requiring him to show cause why he should not be
disciplinarily dealt with or held in contempt, imposing a fine of P1,000.00,
and requiring him to file a comment. On
June 2, 2009, the Court deemed Noble to have waived the filing of the comment.[13]
The
issues for resolution are: whether the COMELEC En Banc gravely abused its
discretion: 1) in declaring Noble qualified to run for the mayoralty position;
and 2) in failing to order the annulment of Noble’s proclamation and refusing
to proclaim Judith Pundaodaya as the winning candidate.
Section
39 of Republic Act No. 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code,
requires that an elective local official must be a resident in the barangay,
municipality, city or province where he intends to serve for at least one year
immediately preceding the election.[14]
In Japzon v. Commission on
Elections,[15]
it was held that the term “residence” is to be understood not in its common
acceptation as referring to “dwelling” or “habitation,” but rather to “domicile”
or legal residence, that is, “the place where a party actually or
constructively has his permanent home, where he, no matter where he may be
found at any given time, eventually intends to return and remain (animus manendi).”
In Domino v. Commission on
Elections,[16]
the Court explained that domicile denotes a fixed permanent residence to
which, whenever absent for business, pleasure, or some other reasons, one
intends to return. It is a question of
intention and circumstances. In the consideration of circumstances, three rules
must be borne in mind, namely: (1) that a man must have a residence or domicile
somewhere; (2) when once established it remains until a new one is acquired;
and (3) a man can have but one residence or domicile at a time.
If one wishes to successfully effect a change of domicile, he
must demonstrate an actual removal or an actual change of domicile, a bona
fide intention of abandoning the former place of residence and establishing
a new one, and definite acts which correspond with the purpose.[17] Without clear and positive proof of the
concurrence of these three requirements, the domicile of origin continues.[18]
Records show that Noble’s
domicile of origin was Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City. However, he claims to have chosen Kinoguitan,
Misamis Oriental as his new domicile. To
substantiate this, he presented before the COMELEC his voter registration
records;[19] a Certification dated April 25, 2007 from Election
Officer II Clavel Z. Tabada;[20] his Marriage Certificate;[21] and affidavits of residents
of Kinoguitan[22]
attesting that he established residence in the municipality after his marriage
to Bernadith Go. In addition, he
presented receipts[23] from the Provincial
Treasurer for payment of his water bills, and Certifications from the Municipal
Treasurer and Municipal Engineer that he has been a consumer of the Municipal
Water System since June 2003. To prove
ownership of property, he also presented a Deed of Sale[24] over a real property
dated June 3, 1996.
The above pieces of documentary
evidence, however, fail to convince us that Noble successfully effected a
change of domicile. As
correctly ruled by the COMELEC Second Division, private respondent’s claim that
he is a registered voter and has actually voted in the past 3 elections in Kinoguitan,
Misamis Oriental do not sufficiently establish that he has actually elected
residency in the said municipality. Indeed, while we
have ruled in the past that voting gives rise to a strong presumption of
residence, it is not conclusive evidence thereof. [25] Thus, in Perez v. Commission on Elections,[26] we held that a person’s
registration as voter in one district is not proof that he is not domiciled in
another district. The registration of a
voter in a place other than his residence of origin is not sufficient to
consider him to have abandoned or lost his residence.[27]
To establish a new
domicile of choice, personal presence in the place must be coupled with conduct
indicative of that intention. It
requires not only such bodily presence in that place but also a declared and
probable intent to make it one’s fixed and permanent place of abode.[28]
In this case, Noble’s
marriage to Bernadith Go does not establish his actual physical presence in
Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental. Neither
does it prove an intention to make it his permanent place of residence. We are also not persuaded by his alleged
payment of water bills in the absence of evidence showing to which specific
properties they pertain. And while Noble
presented a Deed of Sale for real property, the veracity of this document is
belied by his own admission that he does not own property in Kinoguitan,
Misamis Oriental.[29]
On the contrary, we
find that Noble has not abandoned his original domicile as shown by the
following: a) Certification dated April
12, 2007 of the Barangay Kagawad of Barangay Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City stating
that Noble is a resident of the barangay;[30] b) Affidavit[31] of the Barangay Kagawad
of Esperanza, Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental dated April 14, 2007, attesting that
Noble has not resided in Barangay Esperanza in Kinoguitan; c) photos[32] and official receipts[33] showing that Noble and
his wife maintain their residence and businesses in Lapasan; d) tax declarations[34] of real properties in
Cagayan de Oro City under the name of Noble; and e) the “Household Record of
Barangay Inhabitants”[35] of Mayor Narciso Go,
which did not include Noble or his wife, Bernadith Go, which disproves Noble’s
claim that he resides with his father-in-law.
From
the foregoing, we find that Noble’s alleged change of domicile was effected
solely for the purpose of qualifying as a candidate in the 2007 elections. This we cannot allow. In Torayno,
Sr. v. Commission on Elections, [36] we held that the one-year
residency requirement is aimed at excluding outsiders “from taking advantage of
favorable circumstances existing in that community for electoral gain.” Establishing
residence in a community merely to meet an election law requirement defeats the
purpose of representation: to elect through the assent of voters those most
cognizant and sensitive to the needs of the community.[37] Thus, we find Noble disqualified from running
as municipal mayor of Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental in the 2007 elections.
Notwithstanding
Noble’s disqualification, we find no basis for the proclamation of Judith
Pundaodaya, as mayor. The rules on succession under the
Local Government Code, explicitly provides:
SECTION 44. Permanent Vacancies in the Offices of the Governor, Vice-Governor, Mayor, and Vice-Mayor. – If a permanent vacancy occurs in the office of the xxx mayor, the xxx vice-mayor concerned shall become the xxx mayor.
x x x x
For purposes of this Chapter, a permanent vacancy arises when an elective local official fills a higher vacant office, refuses to assume office, fails to qualify or is removed from office, voluntarily resigns, or is otherwise permanently incapacitated to discharge the functions of his office.
x x x x (Emphasis ours)
Thus, considering the permanent vacancy in the Office of the Mayor of
Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental occasioned by Noble’s disqualification, the
proclaimed Vice-Mayor shall then succeed as mayor.[38]
WHEREFORE, the
petition is GRANTED. The August 3, 2007 Resolution
of the COMELEC En Banc in SPA No.
07-202 declaring respondent Arsenio Densing Noble qualified to run as Mayor of
Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental, is REVERSED AND SET ASIDE. In view of the permanent
vacancy in the Office of the Mayor of Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental, the proclaimed Vice-Mayor is ORDERED to succeed as Mayor.
SO ORDERED.
CONSUELO YNARES-SANTIAGO
Associate
Justice
WE CONCUR:
REYNATO S. PUNO
Chief Justice
(On Official Leave)
LEONARDO A.
QUISUMBING ANTONIO T. CARPIO
Associate Justice Associate Justice
RENATO C. CORONA CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES
Associate Justice
Associate Justice
Associate Justice
Associate Justice
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA TERESITA J.
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO
Associate
Justice Associate Justice
ARTURO
D. BRION DIOSDADO M.
PERALTA
Associate Justice Associate
Justice
LUCAS P. BERSAMIN MARIANO C.
Associate Justice Associate Justice
ROBERTO A. ABAD
Associate Justice
Pursuant to Section 13,
Article VIII of the Constitution, it is hereby certified that the conclusions
in the above Decision were reached in consultation before the case was assigned
to the writer of the opinion of the Court.
REYNATO S. PUNO
Chief Justice
[1] Rollo, pp. 9-35.
[2]
[3] Comelec Records, pp. 1-11.
[4]
[5] Rollo, pp. 50-57. Penned by Commissioner Florentino A. Tuason, Jr.
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14] (a) An elective local official must be a citizen of the Philippines; a registered voter in the barangay, municipality, city, or province or, in the case of a member of the sangguniang panlalawigan, sangguniang panlungsod, or sangguniang bayan, the district where he intends to be elected; a resident therein for at least one (1) year immediately preceding the day of the election; and able to read and write Filipino or any other local language or dialect.
[15] G.R. No. 180088, January 19, 2009.
[16] 369 Phil. 798, 818 (1999).
[17]
[18] In
the Matter of the Petition for Disqualification of Tess Dumpit-Michelena, G.R. Nos. 163619-20, November 17,
2005, 475 SCRA 290, 303.
[19] Comelec
Records, pp. 44-45.
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25] Domino v. Commission on Elections, supra note 16 at 820.
[26] 375 Phil. 1106 (1999).
[27]
[28] Domino v. Commission on Elections, supra note 16 at 819.
[29] Comelec Records, p. 33.
[30] Rollo, p. 36.
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36] G.R. No. 137329, August 9, 2000, 337 SCRA 574.
[37] Id. at 584, citing Aquino v.
Commission on Elections, G.R.
No. 120265, September 18, 1995, 248 SCRA 400, 420-421.
[38] Limbona v. Commission on Elections, G.R. No. 181097, June 25, 2008, 555 SCRA 391, 404.