THIRD DIVISION
[A.M. No. MTJ-02-1395.
BAIKONG AKANG CAMSA, complainant, vs. Judge AURELIO D. RENDON, Municipal Trial Court, Isulan, Sultan Kudarat, and Sheriff EDWIN G. CABUG, Regional Trial Court, Branch 19, Isulan, Sultan Kudarat, respondents.
D E C I S I O N
VITUG, J.:
In a complaint, dated 08 April 1998, Judge Aurelio D. Rendon was charged with violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (R.A. 3019), as well as with gross ignorance of the law, and Sheriff Edwin Cabug with gross ignorance of the law and violation of the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employees, both in connection with the execution of the judgment in Civil Case No. 688, entitled "Philippine Evangelical Enterprises vs. Baikong Akang Camsa."
On
"1. To restore the plaintiff in complete possession of the two parcels of land subject of this controversy, Lot No. 3, Sgs-12-000273 and Lot No. 1, Sgs-12-000273, aforementioned;
"2. To remove the wire fence she erected on the property at her own expense;
"3. To pay the plaintiff P50,000.00 as attorney's fees and P10,000.00 as litigation expenses;
"4. To pay the plaintiff the sum of P40,000.00 as exemplary damages; [and]
"5. To pay the cost of this suit."
The decision was not appealed to the Regional Trial Court. When
the decision became final and executory, the plaintiff filed a motion for the
issuance of a writ of execution. On
In his comment, respondent judge denied having issued an alias writ of execution motu proprio but that he only issued it upon motion filed by the plaintiff. He explained that the contents of the alias writ of execution was in total conformity with the dispositive portion of the decision of the court. He strongly disavowed having demanded P60,000.00, or having received P30,000.00, from complainant in exchange for a favorable decision.
Respondent sheriff, in his own comment, maintained that the enforcement of the alias writ of execution was done in accordance with standard rules, and that complainant, in defiance of the writ of execution, had refused to vacate the property, prompting respondent sheriff to then seek the assistance of Provincial Commander Col. Acme and his assistant Col. Rinazo so as to ensure an orderly enforcement of the writ of execution.
On
The OCA, in its memorandum of 25 June 2001, opined that based on the complaint and comment submitted by respondents and "considering the seriousness of the charges against respondents and the conflicting allegations of the parties, a more thorough investigation (was) imperative," and recommended that the matter be referred to Executive Judge German Malcampo of the Regional Trial Court of Isulan, Sultan Kudarat, Branch 19, for investigation, report and recommendation.
The Court, in its resolution of
The OCA, in its memorandum dated
In Hermosa vs. Paraiso,[1]
the respondent, a branch clerk of court of the then Court of First Instance of
Masbate, was charged with irregularities while in office. The matter was referred to an Investigating
Judge considering that there were persons mentioned in the complaint who had to
be questioned. The Investigating Judge,
in his report of
In Maņozca vs. Judge Domagas,[2]
the respondent judge, who was charged with gross ignorance of the law for
having erroneously granted a demurrer to evidence, died while the case was
being evaluated by the
OCA for appropriate action. The Court,
on the basis of what appeared on record, no factual matter being in serious
dispute that would require a formal investigation, resolved to impose a fine of
P5,000.00 on the respondent judge, stressing that he had been previously
sanctioned by the Court for gross ignorance of the law.[3]
In Apiag vs.
Judge Cantero,[4]
the respondent judge was charged with gross misconduct for allegedly having
committed bigamy and falsification of public documents. The case was referred to the Executive Judge
of the
"However, we also cannot just gloss over the fact that he was
remiss in attending to the needs of his children of his first marriage -
children whose filiation he did not deny. He neglected them and refused to
support them until they came up with this administrative charge. For such conduct,
this Court would have imposed a penalty. But in view of his death prior to the
promulgation of this Decision, dismissal of the case is now in order."[5]
It might also be noteworthy that in A.M. No. 97-9-283-RTC
(Report on the Judicial Audit Conducted in Regional Trial Court, Branch 1,
Bangued Abra)[6]
and A.M. No. 98-3-119-RTC
(Judicial Audit Report, Regional Trial Court, Branches 21, 35 & 36 and
Municipal Trial Court in Cities, Branches 1 & 2, Santiago City; Regional
Trial Court, Branch 17, Ilagan, Isabela; Regional Trial Court, Branch 31,
Cabarroguis, Quirino and Municipal Trial Court, Cauayan & Echague, Isabela)[7],
the Court deemed it inappropriate to impose any sanction following the death of
the respondents during the pendency of their cases. In A.M. No. 97-9-283-RTC,
it was shown that Judge Francisco Villacorta failed to decide cases pending
before his court as so reflected by the judicial audit and confirmed by the
OCA. Respondent Villacorta died before
he could submit any explanation. The Court did not see it fit to still impose
any disciplinary action on the respondent judge. In A.M. No. 98-3-119-RTC,
Judge Efren Lamorena of RTC,
In the instant case, respondent judge died while the case would
have still been due for investigation considering that factual issues would yet
to be threshed out. Indeed, the memorandum of the OCA, dated
Anent the request for the partial release of respondent judge's retirement benefits filed by his daughter, the Court, in a resolution, dated 27 June 2001, of its Second Division in Administrative Matter No. 10483-RET (Re: Application for Compulsory Retirement under R.A. 910, as amended, of Hon. Aurelio D. Rendon, Judge, MTC, Sultan Kudarat) resolved to release the retirement benefits of respondent judge but withheld the amount of P20,000.00 pending the outcome of Administrative Matters OCA IPI No. 98-580-MTJ and OCA IPI No. 00-883-MTJ. Since OCA IPI No. 00-883-MTJ has yet to be resolved the P20,000.00 retained amount should still be considered withheld.
Insofar as respondent sheriff Cabug is concerned, the investigation against him should proceed.
WHEREFORE, the instant administrative complaint against Judge Aurelio Rendon of the Municipal Trial Court of Isulan, Sultan Kudarat, is DISMISSED. The case, however, against Sheriff Edwin Cabug is referred to Executive Judge German M. Malcampo, Regional Trial Court, Branch 19, Isulan, Sultan Kudarat, for investigation, report and recommendation within sixty (60) days from receipt of the records of the case.
SO ORDERED.
Melo, (Chairman), Panganiban, Sandoval-Gutierrez, and Carpio, JJ., concur.
[1] 62 SCRA 361.
[2] 248 SCRA 625.
[3] In Lim vs.
Domagas, 227 SCRA 258, the Court ordered respondent judge to pay a fine of
P10,000.00 for disregarding the provision of Section 3(b), Rule 71, of the
Rules of Court; in Tucay vs. Domagas (A.M. No. RTJ-95-1286,
[4] 268 SCRA 47.
[5] At pp. 63-64.
[6] 332 SCRA 273
[7] 343 SCRA 427