EN BANC
[A.M. No. 02-5-111- MCTC. August 7, 2002]
RE: AUDIT CONDUCTED ON THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS OF FORMER CLERK OF COURT MR. WENCESLAO P. TINOY, MCTC, TALAKAG, BUKIDNON
R E S O L U T I O N
CARPIO, J.:
The Case
An audit conducted on the books of
account of former Clerk of Court Mr. Wenceslao P. Tinoy of the Municipal
Circuit Trial Court of Talakag, Bukidnon revealed a delay in remittances of
Judiciary collections. Hence, this
administrative matter.
The Facts
Wenceslao P. Tinoy (“Tinoy” for
brevity) was the Clerk of Court of the Municipal Circuit Trial Court of
Talakag, Bukidnon. Tinoy retired compulsorily on February 28, 2001. He was required to submit his cashbooks and
other related documents for clearance purposes since he handled judiciary funds from January 1990 to
February 28, 2001. Based on the documents presented to the Fiscal Monitoring
Division of the Office of the Court Administrator, the audit revealed a delay
in the remittances of judiciary collections, as follows:
For the Judiciary Development Fund:
Total collections for the period from January 1990 P 62,949.20
to February 2001
Less: Remittance made – January 1990 to 10,770.20
February 2001 _____________
Unremitted Collections as of February 28, 2001 P 52,179.00
Less: Remittance made on
August 23, 2001 (after audit) P 47,352.00
September 6, 2001 (after audit)
P 4,828.00 52,180.00
Final accountability on September 6, 2001 (P
1.00)
(excess payment)
For the Clerk of Court General Fund
Total collections for the period from August P 3,528.00
1996 to February 2001
Less: Remittance made on August 1996 to
February 2001 _____________
Unremitted Collections as of February 28, 2001 P 3,528.00
Less: Remittances made thru PMO’s on:
June 29, 2001 P 2,376.00
November 13, 2001 1,080.00
February 14, 2002 72.00 3,528.00
Final accountability on February 14, 2002 P 0.00
For the Fiduciary Fund:
Total collection for the period March 1995 to P402,700.00
February 28, 2001
Less: Withdrawals made for the same period 150, 000.00
Balance of Unwithdrawn Fiduciary Fund as P252,700.00
of 2/28/01
Less: MTO Balance as of February 28, 2001
229,700.00
Shortage as of February 28, 2001 P 23,000.00
Less: Deposit made on February 14, 2002
(one year after retirement) 23,000.00
Final accountability on February 14, 2002 P
0.00
Thus, from the tabulation, the
unremitted and undeposited collections of Tinoy, as of his retirement date on
February 28, 2001, amounted to Seventy Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Seven Pesos
(P78,707.00).
When asked to explain the delayed
remittances, Tinoy, in his letter dated April 2, 2002, stated that the delay
was due to an oversight as the Money Orders were not mailed on time. It was
only later when he discovered that the date of the Money Orders were about to
expire. Thus, he had to change the
Money Orders.
Tinoy claimed the collections for
the General Fund were remitted on February 7, 2001. He explained that the delay in depositing P23,000.00 accruing to
the Fiduciary Fund was due to a clerical error in computing the total amount of
unwithdrawn Fiduciary Funds. He
allegedly learned about this amount only when the Fiscal Monitoring Office of
the Office of the Court Administrator advised him to deposit the amount with
the Municipal Treasurer’s Office at Talakag, Bukidnon.
OCA Report and
Recommendation
The Court Administrator opined
that the non-remittance on time of judiciary collections deprived the court of
interest that could have been earned had the amounts been deposited in a bank. Moreover, undue delay by the clerk of court
in the remittances of the amounts collected or a shortage in the amounts
remitted constitutes neglect of duty or, at the very least, misfeasance, for
which the clerk of court should be held administratively liable. Thus, the Court Administrator recommended
that a fine of P5,000.00 be imposed on Tinoy for his failure to remit the
collections on time.
The Court’s Ruling
The Court approves and adopts the
recommendation of the Court Administrator.
Settled is the rule that a cash
clerk is grossly negligent in performing his duty if he fails to deposit the
JDF and Fiduciary Fund collections in accordance with Administrative Circulars
Nos. 31-90 and 13-92.[1]
Administrative Circular No. 31-90
dated October 15, 1990 provides that in the RTC, MeTC, MTCC, MTC and MCTC, the
JDF collections shall be deposited daily with an authorized government
depository bank or private bank owned or controlled by the government as
specified by the Chief Justice.[2] The collections shall be deposited
“for the account of the Judiciary Development Fund, Supreme Court, Manila.” If
depositing daily is not possible, deposits shall be made “every second and
third Fridays and at the end of every month.” However, if collections for the
Fund reach P500.00, the same “shall be deposited immediately even before the
days above-indicated.” If there is no branch of the authorized depository bank
at the station of the judge concerned, “the collections shall be sent by postal
money order payable to the Chief Accountant of the Supreme Court, at the latest
before 3:00 p.m. of that particular week.”
Also, Administrative Circular No.
13-92 provides that “all collections for bail bonds, rental deposits, and other
fiduciary collections shall be deposited immediately by the Clerk of Court
concerned, upon receipt thereof, with the authorized government depository
bank.” If there is no branch of an authorized depository bank, or even if there
is but it is impractical to maintain deposits therein, all fiduciary fund collections
shall be deposited by the clerk of court with the Provincial, City or Municipal
Treasurer. The clerks of court are
required to submit to the Chief Accountant of the Supreme Court a quarterly
report on collections and remittances.
Tinoy was indeed grossly negligent
in performing his duty when he failed to deposit the JDF and Fiduciary Fund
collections in accordance with the applicable Administrative Circulars.
From the audit report, the
unremitted and undeposited collections of Tinoy, as of his retirement date on
February 28, 2001, amounted to Seventy Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Seven Pesos
(P78,707.00), which he eventually restituted as follows:
Judiciary Development Fund (JDF):
August 23, 2001 P47,352.00
September 06, 2001 4,828.00 P52,180.00
General Fund (GF):
June 29, 2001 P 2,376.00
November 13, 2001 1,080.00
February 14, 2002 72.00 3,528.00
Fiduciary Fund (FF):
February 14, 2002 23,000.00
Total Amount restituted P78,708.00
Less: Actual shortage incurred 78,707.00
Excess Payment P
1.00
These are obviously delayed
remittances and Tinoy’s explanation of the delayed remittances is totally
unacceptable.
A public office is a public trust.
A public servant is expected to exhibit, at all times, the highest degree of
honesty and integrity.[3] No position demands greater
moral righteousness and uprightness from its occupant than the judicial office.
Those connected with the dispensation of justice bear a heavy burden of
responsibility. Clerks of Court in particular must be individuals of
competence, honesty and probity, charged as they are with safeguarding the
funds, properties and records of the court.
This Court has ordered the
dismissal of clerks of court and other court personnel for failure to deposit
fiduciary funds in authorized government depository banks.[4] We cannot countenance any
conduct, act or omission, committed by those involved in administering justice,
which violate the norm of public accountability and which diminish the faith of
the people in the Judiciary.[5] Since Tinoy has
compulsorily retired on February 28, 2001, he can only be fined in this
administrative case.
WHEREFORE, as recommended by the
Court Administrator, Wenceslao P. Tinoy is FINED Five Thousand Pesos
(P5,000.00) to be deducted from his
retirement benefits.
SO ORDERED.
Davide, Jr., C.J., Bellosillo, Puno, Vitug, Kapunan, Mendoza, Panganiban, Quisumbing, Ynares-Santiago, Sandoval-Gutierrez, Austria-Martinez, and Corona, JJ., concur.
[1] JDF Anomaly in the RTC of Ligao, Albay, 255 SCRA 221
(1996).
[2] Then, the Philippine National Bank (PNB), now the
Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP)
pursuant to Administrative Circular No. 5-93 dated April 30, 1993.
[3] Judiciary Planning Development and Implementation
Office vs. Calaguas, 256 SCRA 690 (1996).
[4] Rangel-Roque
vs. Rivota, 302 SCRA 509 (1999).
[5] Re: Report of Justice Felipe B. Kalalo, 282 SCRA 61
(1997).